<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AI for Code Generation Archives - testRigor AI-Based Automated Testing Tool</title>
	<atom:link href="https://testrigor.com/blog/category/ai-for-code-generation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://testrigor.com/blog/category/ai-for-code-generation/</link>
	<description>Create stable tests in plain English emulating the way humans interact with web or mobile application.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>testRigor vs Playwright vs Selenium: How Plain-English UI Tests Can Cut LLM Token Usage</title>
		<link>https://testrigor.com/blog/testrigor-vs-playwright-vs-selenium/</link>
					<comments>https://testrigor.com/blog/testrigor-vs-playwright-vs-selenium/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel Ernandes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI for Code Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test Automation Tools]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://testrigor.com/?p=1133561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><img width="300" height="144" src="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title-300x144.jpeg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="" style="margin-bottom: 15px;" decoding="async" srcset="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title-300x144.jpeg 300w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title-1024x493.jpeg 1024w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title-768x369.jpeg 768w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title-1536x739.jpeg 1536w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Comparing-LLM-Token-Usage-in-Testing-Title.jpeg 1715w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></div>
<p>In 2025, the enterprise LLM market was valued at USD 8.65 billion and is expected to grow to USD 33.72 billion by 2035. In test automation, when an LLM generates an automated UI test, the representation (code, keyword-driven, natural language) you ask it to produce matters. A testRigor&#8217;s four-line plain-English test can express the same ...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://testrigor.com/blog/testrigor-vs-playwright-vs-selenium/">testRigor vs Playwright vs Selenium: How Plain-English UI Tests Can Cut LLM Token Usage</a> appeared first on <a href="https://testrigor.com">testRigor AI-Based Automated Testing Tool</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://testrigor.com/blog/testrigor-vs-playwright-vs-selenium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is Responsible for Testing AI-Generated Code?</title>
		<link>https://testrigor.com/blog/who-is-responsible-for-testing-ai-generated-code/</link>
					<comments>https://testrigor.com/blog/who-is-responsible-for-testing-ai-generated-code/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hari Mahesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI for Code Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in Testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://testrigor.com/?p=1131727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><img width="300" height="200" src="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Who-is-Responsible-for-Testing-AI-Generated-Code-IMG-300x200.jpeg" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="" style="margin-bottom: 15px;" decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" srcset="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Who-is-Responsible-for-Testing-AI-Generated-Code-IMG-300x200.jpeg 300w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Who-is-Responsible-for-Testing-AI-Generated-Code-IMG-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Who-is-Responsible-for-Testing-AI-Generated-Code-IMG-768x512.jpeg 768w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Who-is-Responsible-for-Testing-AI-Generated-Code-IMG.jpeg 1536w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></div>
<p>“Accountability breeds response-ability.” —Stephen Covey. With the emergence of AI-enhanced software development, the traditional accountability chain in software engineering has changed. When tools such as Copilot or ChatGPT generate code, authorship is obscured, and developers become more of a reviewer than an original creator. This raises an important question: if humans are not fully responsible ...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://testrigor.com/blog/who-is-responsible-for-testing-ai-generated-code/">Who is Responsible for Testing AI-Generated Code?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://testrigor.com">testRigor AI-Based Automated Testing Tool</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://testrigor.com/blog/who-is-responsible-for-testing-ai-generated-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELC 2025 Takeaways: Getting Value from Using AI for Code Generation</title>
		<link>https://testrigor.com/blog/elc-2025-takeaways-getting-value-from-using-ai-for-code-generation/</link>
					<comments>https://testrigor.com/blog/elc-2025-takeaways-getting-value-from-using-ai-for-code-generation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pragya Yadav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI for Code Generation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://testrigor.com/?p=1129326</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<div><img width="300" height="179" src="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ELC-2025-Takeaways-Problem-with-Code-Generation-IMG-300x179.png" class="attachment-medium size-medium wp-post-image" alt="" style="margin-bottom: 15px;" decoding="async" srcset="https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ELC-2025-Takeaways-Problem-with-Code-Generation-IMG-300x179.png 300w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ELC-2025-Takeaways-Problem-with-Code-Generation-IMG-1024x610.png 1024w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ELC-2025-Takeaways-Problem-with-Code-Generation-IMG-768x458.png 768w, https://testrigor.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ELC-2025-Takeaways-Problem-with-Code-Generation-IMG.png 1510w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></div>
<p>Artificial Intelligence has become the buzzword of every engineering conference, boardroom meeting, and product roadmap. But at this year&#8217;s ELC Annual Conference, the conversation took a refreshingly practical turn. Led by Artem Golubev, Co-founder &#38; CEO of testRigor, the roundtable &#8220;Getting Value from Using AI for Code Generation&#8221; brought together engineering leaders who&#8217;ve lived the ...</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://testrigor.com/blog/elc-2025-takeaways-getting-value-from-using-ai-for-code-generation/">ELC 2025 Takeaways: Getting Value from Using AI for Code Generation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://testrigor.com">testRigor AI-Based Automated Testing Tool</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://testrigor.com/blog/elc-2025-takeaways-getting-value-from-using-ai-for-code-generation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
