testRigor vs. endtest
Looking for an intelligent automation tool to minimize the testing effort and cost to achieve faster test completion? Below is a detailed comparison of testRigor and endtest to help you make an informed decision. Have a look and decide which tool best suits your requirements!
Why testRigor?
Capabilities |
|
endtest
|
Insights |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | |||
Generative AI-based Test Creation | Users have the ability to generate entire actual automated tests based on test case titles using testRigor’s Generative AI engine. | ||
Ease of Use by Non-Technical People |
testRigor offers three simple methods for creating tests:
Contrastingly, endtest provides two options for test creation, both relying on ID, CSS, XPath, etc., which may not be feasible for non-technical users. It uses Selenium for locating Web Applications elements, and manual test creation requires providing multiple details for every step and using the Inspect function to locate identifiers, making it more time-consuming compared to testRigor's approach.
|
||
Supported Applications | |||
Desktop Web Testing |
testRigor supports desktop web, mobile web, desktop native app, and mobile app testing for Android and iOS, i.e., basically everything. Use either emulators or actual physical devices for testing, as your choice. endtest does not support desktop native application testing.
|
||
Mobile Web Testing | |||
Desktop Native Application Testing | |||
Native and Hybrid Mobile App Testing - Android and iOS | |||
Supported Testing Types | |||
UI Testing | testRigor helps you perform all testing types faster using the generative AI feature. | ||
End-to-End Testing | |||
Data-driven Testing | |||
Cross-browser Testing | |||
API Testing | |||
Continuous Testing | |||
Database Testing | |||
Visual Testing | |||
Test Case Creation Features | |||
Behavior-Driven Test Generation | Through testRigor testers can use the features written in plain English by the business team as their test cases. Here, the test cases are channeling the behavior of users directly. | ||
Reusable Rules/ Subroutines |
testRigor and endtest both support reusable rules. However, when using endtest, importing the reusable test case is a multi-step process, where the user needs to select multiple values such as Step Name, Action, Details, and then choose the test case name from a dropdown to add it, which can be quite inconvenient. In contrast, testRigor requires just the name of the rule in plain English, and that's it; there are no multiple steps involved. It's super easy and convenient.
|
||
Email Testing |
testRigor supports sending emails, receiving emails, sending attachments, and validating these three scenarios, all easily accomplished using plain English. endtest, on the other hand, allows receiving emails from your application in the endtest mailbox and validates them. To send an email from any endtest-mail.io address, you need to use a separate "Send Email" method, which is not available in the free trial. Adding an attachment with endtest requires using APIs separately. Consequently, email testing using endtest is not as user-friendly.
|
||
Multi-Factor Authentication(MFA) | testRigor supports Gmail 2FA in test cases. endtest also supports SMS and email one-time password authentication. | ||
reCAPTCHA Resolution |
testRigor helps automate image-to-text and Google reCAPTCHA easily. endtest doesn't support reCAPTCHA resolution.
|
||
Built-in Login Support |
testRigor supports login with a single login command. endtest does not provide built-in login support.
|
||
Phone Call | testRigor supports making calls using Twilio. It can validate that a call is ringing, answered, etc. | ||
Sending SMS | testRigor supports sending SMS using Twilio.You can validate if the SMS is delivered, sent, or failed and its contents. | ||
Reading SMS | Both tools support reading and validating the SMS contents. | ||
Geolocation Testing |
testRigor works with geo locations and helps simulate “moving” the device. endtest offers geolocation support only for web tests and NOT for mobile testing.
|
||
File Upload |
Use testRigor to upload single or multiple files in the test case with simple command:
enter "<FILE_URL>" into file input "fileField" However, endtest requires locator of the element for file upload.
|
||
Audio Testing | Perform audio testing in testRigor by recording, comparing, playing, and validating audio files in tests with simple commands: check that audio is playing . |
||
Downloaded File Testing |
testRigor verifies file downloads and validates their contents using simple commands. Supported file types are PDFs, CSVs, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, and more. endtest only supports testing PDF files.
|
||
Video Testing | Validate that the video is playing by the simple command: check that video is playing . |
||
Test Execution Features | |||
Run on Physical Devices | Both tools support testing on emulators and on physical devices. | ||
Parallel Test Runs | testRigor and endtest support parallel test runs to achieve high-speed execution. | ||
Customized Test Data |
testRigor generates data based on the detected field type (with about 50 types in total), and you can also provide your own test data. testRigor creates random data conforming to a specific format every time the test runs. endtest, on the other hand, provides support for customized test data, such as emails. However, this support is not as expansive as what testRigor offers.
|
||
Reporting Features | |||
Screenshots and Reports | Both testRigor and endtest provide good reporting features. | ||
Recorded Video of Test Execution | Both tools provide recorded video of test execution. | ||
Maintenance | |||
Self-healing | Both tools provide self-healing capabilities. |
Thank you for your request. Please select date and time for a demo.