Turn your manual testers into automation experts Request a DemoStart testRigor Free

Selenium Alternative

If someone asks you to name a few of the most popular test automation tools on the market, chances are Selenium will be among the first ones to come to mind. Since its first introduction in 2004, it has become widely known and adopted by many companies around the world. But how does it stand against competition and should you be still using it in 2024? Let’s compare Selenium to testRigor, so that you can see for yourself and choose the right tool.

Why compare Selenium and testRigor?

They’re both test automation tools which are used for functional and regression testing. The biggest difference between the two is in the approach to how tests are created. In Selenium Webdriver, it’s automation QA engineers/SDETs who create those. The downside is that there’s usually not enough visibility of how good the tests actually are (and if they’re converted from manual tests, then how well they are converted). It often results in tests being not very effective or deterministic, which is rarely tracked and inefficient tests are rarely being removed.

In testRigor on the other side, tests are being created in plain English, with the mindset of an end-user. Everyone on the team including manual QA testers, and even product managers are able to contribute. We’re talking about both creating and updating tests. You don’t need to focus on the technical implications anymore, and instead can focus on the tests themselves – which leads to better visibility within the team and more efficient tests.

Selenium’s advantages and limitations

First, let’s dive deeper into Selenium. At the time of its introduction, Selenium Webdriver was the first cross-platform testing framework that could configure and control browsers on the OS level. Being open source certainly played its role in increasing adoption. Selenium supports all of the main languages – JavaScript, Java, Python, Ruby, Kotlin, and C#. The user community is very strong, and you can quickly find an answer to almost any question. The reasons above led to Selenium dominating the market for many years, and companies have built millions of tests with it. But does that mean it’s a perfect tool fit for the job?

Some of the biggest disadvantages that anyone working with Selenium knows are:

  1. Painful initial setup
  2. Tests are extremely challenging to write the right way, but easy to copy (and as a result very soon test maintenance becomes a very grim daily task)
  3. Tests are executed in the process outside of the browser we’re testing. Sleep times need to be added throughout, which is not efficient and often causes the next point:
  4. Test flakiness (typically due to latency, timing, or other asynchronicity issues), which for some reason is perceived as the norm in the community
Ready to join the next era of functional testing?

testRigor’s advantages and limitations

Now let’s look into testRigor. First of all, it’s not just a Web testing tool like Selenium, but rather a powerhouse also capable of testing APIs, mobile browsers, and mobile applications. Despite being introduced a few years ago, it has already gained significant traction with over 51+ million tests ran on the platform. All of the technical aspects which you have to manually take care of in Selenium – such as setup, finding element selectors, adding wait times, re-running the test in case your browser or server under test crashes – are handled by testRigor’s sophisticated AI system. Documentation is straightforward, and in case that’s not enough – there’s also slack-based support for all paid users which is quite quick to respond.

The only disadvantage that can come to mind when comparing testRigor to Selenium is price, but that quickly turns the other way around once you factor in higher salaries for senior automation QA engineers, infrastructure costs, as well as time spent on maintaining flaky tests in Selenium.

but that quickly turns the other way around once you factor in higher salaries for senior automation QA engineers, infrastructure costs, as well as time spent on maintaining flaky tests in Selenium.

Let’s now take a look at a test example below. The goal of the test is to select an element in a dynamic table:
using Automation.Example.Page.PageObject;
using FluentAssertions;
using NUnit.Framework;
using OpenQA.Selenium;
namespace Automation.Example.Test.Ui
    public class TableTest : Automation.Framework.Base.BaseTest
        public class GridComponent : BaseGrid
            private const string COLUMN_NAME_ACTIONS = "Actions";
            private IWebElement GetCellElement(int rowIndex, int columnIndex)
                var cellElement = GetGridContainer()
                return cellElement;
            public int GetRowIndexByMatchingText(string columnName, string cellValue)
                IList cellValues = GetAllCellValues(columnName);
                var index = cellValues.IndexOf(cellValue);
                return index;
            public void ClickActionsEditLink(int rowIndex)
                var columnIndex = GetColumnIndexByName(COLUMN_NAME_ACTIONS);
                var cellElement = GetCellElement(rowIndex, columnIndex);
                WaitUtils.WaitForAndClick(() => cellElement.FindElement(Locator.EditLink));
            public void ClickActionsDeleteLink(int rowIndex)
                var columnIndex = GetColumnIndexByName(COLUMN_NAME_ACTIONS);
                var cellElement = GetCellElement(rowIndex, columnIndex);
                WaitUtils.WaitForAndClick(() => cellElement.FindElement(Locator.DeleteLink));
        public LoginPage LoginPage { get; set; }
        public GridComponent Grid { get; set; }
        public void TestGrid()
            var columnName = "Id";
            var testCellValue = "spk2";
            // Test
            var rowIndex = Grid.GetRowIndexByMatchingText(columnName, testCellValue);
            // Assert
            Grid.GetRowIndexByMatchingText(columnName, testCellValue).Should().Be(-1, "Item should be deleted from the table");

click on the second button within the context of table at row containing "spk2" and column "Actions"

We hope it becomes clear in this article that testRigor drastically changes the way automation tests are built – and saves the tech teams time, money, and eliminates a lot of frustration. You’re very welcome to start with a free public tier to explore testRigor and make a decision for yourself.
Why chose testRigor over Selenium?
Use test automation software that scales with your business needs. See why testRigor is the future of test automation.
Write Tests In Plain English
Effortless Set-Up
Web, Mobile, API Testing
Little To No Maintenance
No Test Flakiness
Transfer Tests Between Frameworks
Built In Reporting & Dashboards
Request a Demo
Ready to move your software testing into the next stage of scale and efficiency? After submitting this form, our team will reach out to you to schedule a demo where they can also answer your technical questions.


The connection to the server timed out!

Thank you for your request. Please select date and time for a demo.