Metrics for Engineering Manager
 |
Engineering Managers play a critical role in technical execution and people management. They ensure the teams are productive, engaged and aligned with organizational goals. Engineering managers are responsible for the delivery of their projects and also for the overall performance of the team. To effectively manage these responsibilities, they rely on different metrics that help measure productivity, quality, team health, etc.
So let’s go through these critical metrics and also explore their significance, how they are measured and how they help to increase the team’s performance.
Importance of Metrics in Engineering Management
Metrics play a pivotal role in engineering management for several reasons:
- Objective Decision-Making: Metrics provide a data-driven foundation for decision-making, reducing reliance on subjective judgments and biases.
- Performance Monitoring: They allow managers to track the performance of teams, individual engineers and the overall engineering process.
- Continuous Improvement: Metrics identify areas that need improvement, helping teams focus on processes or practices that can be optimized.
- Accountability: Clear metrics establish expectations and accountability within the team, ensuring that everyone is aligned with the project’s goals.
- Stakeholder Communication: Metrics serve as a communication tool, helping managers explain progress, challenges and successes to stakeholders.
Productivity Metrics
These metrics are one of the most important metrics for engineering managers. They help to provide a quantitative way to measure the efficiency of their team. With these metrics, the managers will able to understand how well the team is performing, identify areas for improvement and make changes so that the team’s performance can be improved. In this article we will go through a few important productive metrics used by engineering managers frequently.
Deployment Frequency
It measures how frequently the code is deployed in the production environment. This metric is particularly relevant in continuous integration/continuous deployment environments.
Interpretation: Higher deployment frequency means the team is releasing updates and new features in quick intervals. This is really required to maintain the cutting edge. However, it is mandatory to ensure that the frequent releases should not compromise the quality. There should always be a balance between frequency and stability that needs to be maintained.
Calculation: Deployment frequency can be calculated by counting the total number of deployments over a period of time.
Deployment Frequency= Number of deployments in a time period
Example: If a team deploys code to production 3 times a day, their deployment frequency is 3 deployments per day.
Code Churn
It measures the number of lines of code that are added, modified or deleted over a period of time. It is usually measured as the percentage of code that has been modified over a period of time.
Interpretation: Higher code churn means the codebase is insatiable, there are frequent changes in the code and it even indicates the poor initial implementation. Though some churn is expected during development, excessive churn may suggest issues with requirements, design, or code quality. Keeping code churn within reasonable limits is essential for maintaining a stable and maintainable codebase.
Calculation: Code churn is calculated by adding up all the code changes and then dividing it by the time-lapse.
Code Churn = (Lines Added + Lines Modified + Lines Deleted) / Time Period
Example: If a developer adds 200 lines, modifies 50 lines and deletes 30 lines of code in a week, their Code Churn for that week is 280 lines. Monitoring this metric can help in identifying parts of the codebase that may require more stable and robust design.
Resource Utilization
It is a critical metric for Engineering Managers as it helps to measure how effectively the team’s time and skill are utilized. It is usually calculated in percentage. It’s a balancing act: over-utilization can lead to burnout, while under-utilization can indicate inefficiency.
Interpretation: The ideal resource utilization is considered between 80% to 90%. This means the engineer is productive most of the time but has enough time for non-productive activities like meetings, etc. Below 70% utilization is usually considered underutilized, which may lead to disengagement, lower morale and inefficiency. Above 90% is considered as overutilized, which means the resource has got too much work. This can lead to burnout, reduced quality of work and a decline in creativity and problem-solving ability.
Calculation: Resource utilization is calculated by dividing total worked hours by total hours. It is usually calculated in percentage as discussed above.
Resource Utilization = (Total Hours Worked / Total Available Hours) * 100
Example: If a developer is available for 40 hours a week but only works 30 productive hours, the Resource Utilization is 75%. Maintaining optimal utilization rates is key to sustaining productivity without overburdening the team.
Cycle Time
It measures the time taken for a feature to go from start to completion. This metric is important for the Engineering Manager as it directly reflects the team’s efficiency in delivering work.
Interpretation: Shorter cycle times are always preferred as they indicate the team can deliver new features, enhancement or bug fixes more quickly. Longer cycle time shows bottlenecks, complexities in work and process efficiency. Monitoring cycle time helps in identifying areas where the process can be optimized.
Calculation: Cycle time is the difference from end time to start time.
Cycle Time = End Date - Start Date
Example: If a task starts on August 1st and finishes on August 5th, the Cycle Time is four days. Tracking this across multiple tasks can help identify bottlenecks in the workflow.
Quality Metrics
Quality metrics are critical tools for Engineering Managers to evaluate the quality of applications under development. These metrics help maintain the quality of the software throughout the development process and provide more detailed aspects of software quality, including reliability, maintainability, performance and user satisfaction. By understanding and effectively utilizing these metrics, managers can identify potential issues early, optimize development and testing processes and ensure that the final product meets or exceeds customer expectations. So, let’s go through a few key quality metrics.
Defect Density
The defect density metric measures the number of defects found in the codebase relative to the size of the code. An engineering manager can assess the quality of the code with the help of these metrics.
Interpretation: A lower defect density indicates the code quality is good. Similarly, a higher defect density means the code needs to be modified again or needs more refactoring. This metric helps in identifying the problematic areas in the codebase that require more testing. This metric can also be considered as an indicator of the quality assurance process.
Calculation: Defect density can be calculated by dividing the defects found by the size of the codebase. The size of the codebase is usually calculated in KLOC ( Thousands of lines of Code)
Defect Density = Number of Defects / Size of the Codebase (in KLOC or Function Points)
Example: If 20 defects are found in a module with 10,000 lines of code, the Defect Density is 2 defects per KLOC (Kilos/Thousands of Lines of Code). This metric helps in identifying areas that may require more attention or a review of the development practices.
Escaped Defects
These metrics track the count of defects that were not caught during the testing phase and were identified after the application was released to production. These metrics help the engineering managers understand the effectiveness of the testing process and the overall quality of the application.
Interpretation: A low number of escaped defects shows the test process is very effective and testing has captured most of the issues before the application is released to production. That means the application is of high quality. Similarly, a higher escaped defect shows the test coverage is not sufficient. It can be due to inadequate testing process or very frequent releases. This, in turn, affects the higher maintenance costs and damages the product’s reputation.
Tracking escaped defects helps Engineering Managers identify areas for improvement in the testing and development process.
Escaped Defects= Number of Defects Found After Release
Example: If a software release had 100 defects identified during testing, but 15 more defects were reported by users post-release, the number of escaped defects is 15.
Test Coverage
It measures the extent to which a codebase is tested by automated tests. It is typically expressed as a percentage of the total code covered by tests. This metric is essential for Engineering Managers because it provides insight into the thoroughness of the testing process and the potential risks of untested code.
Interpretation: A high percentage (e.g., 80% or more) generally indicates that a significant portion of the code is tested, which reduces the risk of defects in production. A low test coverage percentage suggests that a substantial amount of the code is untested, increasing the likelihood of undetected bugs and issues. Engineering Managers should use test coverage metrics to identify areas of the code that are under-tested and may require additional focus.
Calculation: Test coverage is calculated by dividing the number of test lines of code by total lines of code. It is usually expressed in terms of percentage.
Test Coverage = ( Total Lines of Code / Number of Tested Lines of Code ) x 100
Example: If a codebase has 20,000 lines of code and automated tests cover 15,000 lines, the test coverage would be:
Test Coverage = (15000 / 20000) x 100 = 75%
Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR)
It measures the average time it takes to fully resolve a defect or issue after it has been reported. This metric is crucial for Engineering Managers as it provides insight into the efficiency and effectiveness of the team’s problem-solving capabilities and their ability to maintain system reliability.
Interpretation: A low MTTR indicates that the team is resolving issues quickly, minimizing downtime and restoring normal operations efficiently. A high MTTR suggests that it takes longer to resolve issues, which could lead to prolonged system downtimes and negatively impact user experience. Engineering Managers should monitor MTTR to identify bottlenecks in the issue resolution process. If the MTTR is trending upwards, it may be necessary to review and optimize the team’s workflows, improve communication, or provide additional training and resources.
Calculation: Mean time to resolution is usually calculated by dividing the time spent on resolving issues by total number of issues.
MTTR = Number of Issues Resolved / Total Time Spent on Resolving Issues
Example: If the team resolves five issues and the total time spent on resolving these issues is 25 hours, the MTTR would be:
MTTR = 5 issues / 25 hours = 5 hours
Team Health Metrics
Team Health metrics help the Engineering Managers with more details on the team’s overall health. It’s not about the technical output, but also gives details on the emotional and psychological well-being of the team members. These metrics provide more details about job satisfaction, work-life balance and team dynamics. By regularly tracking and analyzing these metrics, managers can identify potential issues early, such as burnout or disengagement and take proactive steps to address them. We will be going through a few critical team health metrics.
Employee Engagement
Employee engagement measures the emotional commitment and level of motivation that team members have towards their work and the organization as a whole. When employees are highly engaged, they are more likely to put in extra effort, show greater enthusiasm for their tasks and contribute positively to the team’s success.
Calculation: Employee engagement can be calculated using various methods, with some of the most common being surveys, engagement indexes and the Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS). Here’s a breakdown of how these calculations work:
Employee Engagement Surveys
Employee engagement surveys typically consist of multiple questions prepared to assess different aspects of engagement, such as job satisfaction, commitment to the organization and alignment with company values.
Calculation: Each question is usually rated on a Likert scale (e.g., 1 to 5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree). The responses are averaged to create an overall engagement score.
Example: If an employee rates five questions with the following scores: 4, 5, 3, 4, 5, the average engagement score for that employee would be:
Engagement Score = ( 4 + 5 + 3 + 4 + 5 ) / 5 = 4.2
Employee Engagement Index
An Engagement Index is a composite score based on responses to key questions that are directly related to engagement. These might include questions about the employee’s willingness to recommend the company, their intention to stay and their sense of personal accomplishment.
Calculation: Identify key questions in the survey that are most strongly associated with engagement. Average the scores from these questions to calculate the Engagement Index.
Example: If the key questions receive scores of 4, 4 and 5, the Engagement Index would be:
Engagement Index = ( 4 + 4 + 5 ) / 3 = 4.33
Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS)
The Employee Net Promoter Score (eNPS) measures how likely employees are to recommend their organization as a great place to work. It’s calculated by asking employees to rate this likelihood on a scale of 0 to 10.
Calculation:
- Employees who score 9-10 are categorized as Promoters.
- Those who score 0-6 are Detractors.
- Scores of 7-8 are Passives and are typically excluded from the calculation.
- The eNPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of Detractors from the percentage of Promoters.
eNPS = %Promoters – %Detractors
eNPS = 60% – 10% = 50
Burnout Rate
It measures the percentage of employees experiencing burnout due to prolonged stress, excessive workload or other work-related factors. For Engineering Managers, monitoring the burnout rate is essential because high burnout can lead to decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, higher turnover and overall lower team morale.
Interpretation: A high burnout rate, such as 20% or more, indicates that a significant portion of the team is struggling with stress and exhaustion. This situation can lead to a decline in team performance, increased error rates and a higher likelihood of turnover as employees may leave to seek a healthier work environment. A low burnout rate suggests that the team is managing stress well, has a balanced workload and is likely more satisfied with their work environment. This leads to higher productivity, better collaboration and lower turnover rates.
Calculation: Burnout rate is typically measured through anonymous surveys where employees are asked about their levels of stress, exhaustion and emotional well-being. A common method is to ask employees to self-report whether they feel burned out or on the verge of burnout.
Burnout Rate = Total Number of Employees Reporting Burnout / Number of Employees x 100
Example: If a team consists of 20 employees and 4 of them report feeling burned out, the burnout rate would be:
Burnout Rate = ( 4 / 20) x 100 = 20%
Attrition Rate
Also known as turnover rate, measures the percentage of employees who leave an organization or team over a specific period. For Engineering Managers, understanding and monitoring the attrition rate is crucial because it directly impacts team stability, productivity and morale. High attrition can be a sign of underlying issues within the team or organization, such as poor management practices, lack of career growth opportunities or a toxic work environment.
Interpretation: A high attrition rate (e.g., 20% or higher) may indicate dissatisfaction among employees, potentially due to factors like inadequate compensation, lack of career advancement, poor work-life balance, or a negative work culture. A low attrition rate (e.g., below 10%) suggests that employees are generally satisfied with their roles and the work environment.
Calculation: The attrition rate is calculated by dividing the number of employees who left the organization or team during a specific period by the average number of employees during that period and then multiplying by 100 to express it as a percentage.
Attrition Rate = ( Average Number of Employees Who Left / Number of Employees ) x 100
Example: Suppose a team has an average of 50 employees over the year and 10 employees leave during that year. The attrition rate would be:
Attrition Rate = ( 10 / 50 ) x 100 = 20%
Delivery Metrics
They are important for Engineering Managers as they help understand how well the team is performing in delivering software projects. By tracking these metrics, managers can spot any problems, improve processes and make sure everything runs smoothly from start to finish. These metrics give useful information about whether projects are completed on time, stay within the planned scope and meet quality standards. So, let’s review a few critical delivery metrics that an engineering manager needs to follow.
Release Frequency
It measures how often new features, updates, or fixes are released to production. For Engineering Managers, this metric is crucial because it reflects the agility of the development process and the team’s ability to deliver value to customers continuously. High release frequency often indicates a mature and efficient development pipeline, while low frequency may suggest bottlenecks or inefficiencies.
Interpretation: A high release frequency suggests that the team is able to quickly push new features, improvements and bug fixes to production. Frequent releases can also lead to faster feedback loops. A low release frequency may indicate challenges within the development process, such as long testing cycles, complex deployment procedures, or a lack of automation. It might also suggest that the team is struggling with technical debt. For Engineering Managers, monitoring release frequency can help identify opportunities to streamline the development process, improve automation and ensure that the team can deliver high-quality software at a pace that meets business and customer expectations.
Calculation: Release frequency is typically calculated by counting the number of releases made over a specific time period, such as a week, month, or quarter.
Release Frequency = Number of Releases / Time Period
Example: If a team releases 4 updates in a month, the release frequency is:
Release Frequency = 4 releases / 1 month = 4 releases per month
Lead Time
It measures the total time taken from the moment a work item (such as a feature, bug fix, or task) is requested until it is delivered to production. For Engineering Managers, understanding and optimizing lead time is essential because it directly impacts the team’s ability to deliver value to customers quickly and efficiently.
Interpretation: A short lead time indicates that the team is able to deliver new features, bug fixes, or updates quickly. This is typically a sign of an efficient development process, where work items move smoothly through the pipeline with minimal delays. A long lead time suggests that it takes the team a significant amount of time to deliver work items. This can be due to various factors, such as complex approval processes, bottlenecks in development or testing, inadequate resources, or high levels of technical debt. Engineering Managers should monitor lead time to identify inefficiencies or delays in the development process.
Calculation: Lead time is calculated by measuring the time between the initiation of a request and its completion.
Lead Time = Delivery Date - Request Date
Example: If a customer requests a new feature on August 1st and it is deployed to production on August 15th, the lead time for this feature would be:
Lead Time = 15 days
Deployment Success Rate
It measures the percentage of deployments that are successfully completed without any critical issues, failures, or rollbacks. For Engineering Managers, this metric is crucial because it reflects the reliability and stability of the deployment process, as well as the overall quality of the code being released.
Interpretation: A high deployment success rate (e.g., 95% or above) indicates that the deployment process is well-controlled and that the code being deployed is of high quality. A low deployment success rate indicates frequent failures or rollbacks, which can lead to downtime, increased support costs and customer dissatisfaction. For Engineering Managers, monitoring the Deployment Success Rate is critical to ensuring the reliability of the deployment process. If the success rate is low, it may be necessary to strengthen testing practices, improve CI/CD pipelines, or implement more rigorous code reviews.
Calculation: Deployment Success Rate is calculated by dividing the number of successful deployments by the total number of deployments within a specific period and then multiplying by 100 to express it as a percentage.
Deployment Success Rate = ( Number of Successful Deployments / Total Number of Deployments ) x 100
Example: If a team performs 20 deployments in a month and 18 of them are successful (i.e., without any major issues or rollbacks), the Deployment Success Rate would be:
Deployment Success Rate = ( 18 / 20 ) x 100 = 90%
Customer-Focused Metrics
These metrics help Engineering Managers to ensure that the software development process aligns with customer needs and expectations. These metrics help gauge customer satisfaction, product quality and the impact of the software on end-users. By tracking these metrics, Engineering Managers can make informed decisions that enhance customer experience and drive business success. Let’s go through a few of the key customer-focused metrics.
Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)
It measures how satisfied customers are with a product, service, or specific interaction. For Engineering Managers, CSAT is crucial because it provides direct feedback on the customer’s perception of the product’s quality and usability, which is essential for guiding product development and improvement efforts.
Interpretation: A high CSAT score (e.g., 80% or above) indicates that the majority of customers are satisfied with the product, which suggests that the product meets customer needs and expectations. A low CSAT score indicates that a significant portion of customers are dissatisfied. This could be due to various factors such as bugs, poor user experience, missing features, or inadequate support. For Engineering Managers, the CSAT metric is a valuable tool for assessing the impact of product releases, updates and overall customer experience.
Calculation: CSAT is typically measured through surveys that ask customers to rate their satisfaction on a scale (commonly 1-5, where 1 is “very dissatisfied” and 5 is “very satisfied”). The CSAT score is then calculated as the percentage of respondents who rate their experience as “satisfied” (usually 4 or 5).
CSAT = ( Number of Satisfied Customers / Total Number of Respondents ) x 100
Example: If 80 out of 100 customers rate their satisfaction as 4 or 5, the CSAT score would be:
CSAT = ( 80 / 100 ) x 100 = 80%
Customer Reported Defects
These metrics track the number of defects or issues reported by customers after a product has been released. For Engineering Managers, this metric is vital as it directly reflects the quality of the product from the customer’s perspective and impacts customer satisfaction, retention and brand reputation.
Interpretation: A high number of customer-reported defects indicates that customers are encountering significant issues with the product, which could lead to dissatisfaction, increased support costs and potential churn. A low number of defects indicates that the product is generally meeting customer expectations in terms of quality and reliability. For Engineering Managers, tracking Customer Reported Defects is essential for maintaining high product quality and customer satisfaction.
Calculation: Customer Reported Defects are typically tracked by counting the number of unique defect reports received from customers over a specific period.
Example: If 50 defects are reported by customers in a month, the metric is simply: Customer Reported Defects= 50 defects
Cost Metrics
They are essential for Engineering Managers to manage and optimize the financial aspects of software development. These metrics help ensure that projects are completed within budget, resources are used efficiently and the value delivered aligns with the costs incurred. Here’s an overview of key cost metrics:
Cost per Story Point
Cost per Story Point helps to estimate the financial efficiency of a software development team by measuring the average cost associated with delivering one story point. Story points are a unit of measure used in Agile development to estimate the relative effort required to complete a task or feature. For Engineering Managers, understanding the Cost per Story Point is crucial for budgeting, forecasting and assessing the cost-effectiveness of the development process.
Interpretation: A lower cost per story point indicates that the team is delivering features and tasks more cost-effectively. A higher cost per story point might indicate inefficiencies in the development process, such as low productivity, resource misallocation, or overestimation of effort. For Engineering Managers, tracking Cost per Story Point helps in understanding the financial efficiency of the development process. Budget Variance
Calculation: Cost per Story Point is calculated by dividing the total cost of the development team (including salaries, tools and other expenses) by the total number of story points completed within a specific period, such as a sprint or a release cycle.
Cost per Story Point = Total Cost of Development / Total Story Points Completed
Example: If the total cost of development for a sprint is $50,000 and the team completes 100 story points, the Cost per Story Point would be:
Cost per Story Point = 50,000 USD / 100 story points = 500 USD per story point
Return on Investment (ROI)
Return on Investment (ROI) is a critical financial metric that measures the profitability of a project relative to its costs. For Engineering Managers, ROI is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in software development projects, determining whether the resources and budget allocated to a project are yielding sufficient financial returns.
Interpretation: A high ROI, such as 150%, indicates that the project has generated a significant profit relative to its cost. A low or negative ROI indicates that the project did not generate enough revenue to cover its costs, resulting in a financial loss. For Engineering Managers, monitoring ROI helps in making informed decisions about which projects to pursue, continue, or halt. A consistently high ROI across projects suggests that the team is effectively managing resources and delivering valuable products. Conversely, a pattern of low or negative ROI may prompt a review of project selection criteria, budgeting practices and development processes to improve financial outcomes.
Calculation: ROI is calculated by dividing the net profit generated by a project by the total cost of the investment and then multiplying by 100 to express it as a percentage.
ROI = ( Net Profit from Project - Cost of Investment ) / Cost of Investment x 100
Example: Suppose a software product generates $500,000 in revenue after its release and the total development cost was $200,000. The ROI would be calculated as follows:
ROI = ( 500,000 USD – 200,000 USD ) / 200,000 USD x 100 = 150%
Technical Debt Ratio
Technical Debt Ratio is a crucial metric that quantifies the cost of addressing technical debt in relation to the cost of building the software system. For Engineering Managers, this metric provides a clear indication of how much future work and cost are being deferred due to shortcuts or suboptimal coding practices. It helps in assessing the long-term maintainability and sustainability of the codebase.
Interpretation: A low ratio, such as 5% or less, suggests that the codebase is relatively clean and maintainable. This indicates that the team is following good development practices and minimizing shortcuts, which helps in keeping future maintenance costs low. A high ratio, such as 20% or more, indicates that a significant portion of the development effort will need to be reinvested to fix accumulated debt. For Engineering Managers, monitoring the Technical Debt Ratio is essential for making informed decisions about when to prioritize debt remediation versus delivering new features.
Calculation: The Technical Debt Ratio is calculated by dividing the estimated cost to remediate (fix) the technical debt by the total cost of developing the software system. The result is then multiplied by 100 to express it as a percentage.
Technical Debt Ratio = Cost to Remediate Debt / Cost to Develop System x 100
Example: If the estimated cost to fix the technical debt is $100,000 and the total development cost of the system is $1,000,000, the Technical Debt Ratio would be:
Technical Debt Ratio = 100,000 USD / 1,000,000 USD x 100 = 10%
Integrating Metrics into Engineering Management
For metrics to be effective, they must be integrated into the engineering management process in a way that aligns with the team’s goals and culture. Here are some best practices for integrating metrics:
- Align Metrics with Goals: Ensure that the metrics chosen align with the organization’s strategic goals and the specific objectives of the engineering team.
- Use a Balanced Approach: Avoid focusing too much on a single metric. Use a balanced set of metrics that cover productivity, quality, team health and delivery performance.
- Involve the Team: Engage the engineering team in the selection and interpretation of metrics. This fosters ownership and ensures that the metrics are relevant and actionable.
- Review and Adjust Regularly: Metrics should not be static. Regularly review them to ensure they remain aligned with the team’s goals and adjust them as necessary.
- Communicate Metrics Effectively: Use clear and consistent communication when sharing metrics with stakeholders. Provide context and interpretation to ensure that the metrics are understood and actionable.
- Focus on Continuous Improvement: Use metrics as a tool for continuous improvement rather than as a means of enforcing rigid targets. Encourage the team to use metrics to identify opportunities for growth and development.
Challenges and Pitfalls
While metrics are invaluable tools, they also come with challenges and potential pitfalls:
- Over-Reliance on Metrics: Overemphasis on metrics can lead to a focus on quantity over quality, gaming the system, or ignoring non-measurable aspects of the engineering process.
- Misinterpretation of Data: Metrics can be misinterpreted, especially if they are taken out of context or used without a thorough understanding of the underlying factors.
- Metric Overload: Too many metrics can overwhelm teams and dilute focus. It’s important to prioritize the most relevant metrics and avoid unnecessary complexity.
- Ignoring Qualitative Factors: Metrics often focus on quantitative data, but qualitative factors such as team dynamics, creativity and customer empathy are equally important and should not be overlooked.
Conclusion
Metrics are essential for engineering managers, providing the data needed to monitor performance, drive improvement and achieve strategic goals. By selecting the right metrics and using them effectively, engineering managers can enhance productivity, maintain high-quality standards, support team health and ensure the successful delivery of products and features.
However, it is crucial to approach metrics with care, ensuring they are aligned with goals, balanced and interpreted in context. When used wisely, metrics can empower engineering teams to reach their full potential and deliver outstanding results.
| Achieve More Than 90% Test Automation | |
| Step by Step Walkthroughs and Help | |
| 14 Day Free Trial, Cancel Anytime |
