Turn your manual testers into automation experts! Request a DemoStart testRigor Free

Accessibility Testing: Ensuring Inclusivity in Software

In this new digital age, one of the most critical elements in software development is inclusivity. Accessibility testing is the essential procedure that guarantees user interface designs are sufficiently usable and available to individuals with disabilities. Accessibility testing breaks barriers, ensuring that technology caters to a wider audience, including those with visual, auditory, cognitive, or motor impairments. It ensures that the web and software applications are accessible to everyone as per recognized standards, including the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

What is Accessibility Testing?

Accessibility testing is the practice of making sure that your website or mobile app can be used by people who have special needs. They could be visual disabilities, such as ‘low-vision’, blindless or color-blindness; hearing impairment and deafness; some motility issues (not being able to use a mouse or keyboard); cognitive deficiencies like color blindness, learning difficulties of memory problems, etc. This testing aims at making a site (or software) usable by all irrespective of gender or disability.

Accessibility testing is more than just a compliance exercise. It’s about creating a better user experience for everyone. Inclusive design improves usability for all users, not just those with disabilities because it encourages developers to think about different ways people interact with software and websites.

Importance of Accessibility Testing

Ensuring that software is accessible to everyone is about promoting a more inclusive digital world. This is vital for several reasons:

Ethical Responsibility

In a technologically saturated world, designers are responsible for making sure that digital products are accessible and usable for everyone, regardless of their abilities. Making them accessible allows companies and developers to do social good in the direction of inclusivity for everyone.

Legal Compliance

Regulations in numerous countries stipulate that all digital content must be made accessible. Regulations like the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in the United States and the European Union Web Accessibility Directive mandate businesses and public sector organizations to make their digital services accessible to people with disabilities. Not adhering to these laws can have serious legal implications, including lawsuits and penalties. Read: How to Build an ADA-compliant App.

Expanding Market Reach

An additional way businesses are expanding their market is by making digital products accessible. More than a billion people, one in seven of us on the planet according to the World Health Organization have a disability. By not catering for accessibility you run the risk of excluding a large section of your potential customer/user base.

Enhancing User Experience for All

Accessibility features typically provide a better experience to everyone, even if the user has a relevant disability. For instance, captions built to assist people with hearing disabilities can also be useful for users in loud environments, and keyboard navigation is beneficial to those who do not want or cannot use a pointer device (mouse), plus temporary physical limitations such as a broken arm. 

Boosting SEO Performance

Websites that are more accessible tend to rank higher in search engine results. Using alt text for images and semantic HTML structure makes it easier for search engines to read content, and effective design has high accessibility value. It will enhance the website or application with better discoverability and thus be more accessible to everyone.

Types of Disabilities and Challenges in Accessibility

Understanding the different types of disabilities and the challenges faced by people with those disabilities is essential in creating accessible software. Accessibility testing should consider the following disability categories:

Visual Disabilities

They can range from partial sight, color blindness, and low vision to complete blindness. Users with these impairments rely on screen readers, magnification tools, and braille displays to interact with websites and software.

Challenges:

  • Users may not be able to see visual content or images.
  • Complex layouts can be challenging to navigate with a screen reader.
  • Color contrast issues can make text difficult to read for users with low vision or color blindness.

Hearing Disabilities

Hearing disabilities include partial or total deafness. Users with hearing impairments may miss out on audio content or auditory alerts.

Challenges:

  • Multimedia content, such as videos and podcasts, may be inaccessible without captions or transcripts.
  • Auditory cues in software (e.g., sounds for alerts) may not be effective for users with hearing impairments.

Motor Disabilities

Motor disabilities affect a user’s ability to interact with input devices such as a mouse or keyboard. Conditions like arthritis, paralysis or repetitive strain injuries can limit a user’s ability to perform specific tasks.

Challenges:

  • Difficulty in using a mouse or touchscreen, requiring alternative input methods like voice control or keyboard navigation.
  • Inability to complete tasks that require precise movements, such as dragging or swiping.
  • Timed activities may be challenging for users with motor impairments.

Cognitive Disabilities

They include conditions such as dyslexia, memory problems, ADHD and learning disabilities. These impairments can affect how users process information, understand instructions and interact with complex user interfaces.

Challenges:

  • Complex navigation and instructions may confuse or overwhelm users with cognitive impairments.
  • Difficulties in remembering sequences of tasks or steps.
  • Difficulty reading text that is too complex or written in jargon-heavy language.

Accessibility Testing Methods

There are various methods for conducting accessibility testing. These methods help developers and testers identify barriers in software and websites, ensuring that they comply with accessibility standards and guidelines.

Manual Testing

Manual accessibility testing involves having testers interact with a website or application using various assistive technologies, such as screen readers, voice recognition software or alternative input devices like keyboards. Manual testing can be done by testers who are familiar with accessibility guidelines or by individuals with disabilities who use assistive technologies in their daily lives.

Key Techniques:

  • Keyboard-Only Testing: Many users with motor impairments or visual disabilities rely on keyboard navigation instead of a mouse. Testers should check that all functions, including form inputs, links and buttons, can be accessed using the keyboard alone.
  • Screen Reader Testing: Screen readers convert on-screen text to speech or braille, allowing blind or visually impaired users to interact with digital content. Testing with screen readers like JAWS or NVDA ensures that the website or app can be navigated and understood by users who cannot see the screen.
  • Color Contrast Testing: Ensuring adequate color contrast between text and background is crucial for users with visual impairments. Manual testing can help ensure that content is legible for all users.

Automated Accessibility Testing

Automated accessibility testing tools can help identify common accessibility issues, such as missing alt text, low contrast and improper use of HTML tags. These tools can analyze large portions of a website or application quickly, identifying problems that need to be addressed.

Automating Accessibility Testing with testRigor

With testRigor, you can test accessibility on each page of the application. For that, you don’t need to write separate code. You can do that by enabling the “Run accessibility test on each page:” option in the Settings.  

testRigor validates Section 508, ADA, ACAA, AODA, CVAA, EN 301 549, VPAT, and more compliances. To learn how you can use testRigor to perform accessibility testing in detail, read this blog: Accessibility Testing.

Accessibility Testing with Real-Users

The most effective form of accessibility testing involves real users with disabilities. These individuals provide valuable insights into how accessible and usable the product is in real-world conditions. Their feedback highlights issues that may not be apparent through automated or manual testing conducted by testers.

User testing sessions with people who have various disabilities help developers and testers identify unforeseen challenges. For instance, a blind user may encounter difficulties that an automated tool or screen reader testing might not catch. Testing with real users is invaluable in ensuring that a product is truly accessible to its target audience.

Accessibility Guidelines and Standards

To standardize accessibility across digital products, various organizations have established guidelines and standards. These guidelines serve as a framework for developers and testers to ensure that their software is accessible to everyone.

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)

The most widely adopted standard for web accessibility is the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). WCAG outlines various recommendations for making web content accessible to people with disabilities.

Key Principles of WCAG:

  • Perceivable: Content must be presented in a way that users can perceive it. For example, images should include alt text for visually impaired users and videos should include captions for hearing-impaired users.
  • Operable: Users must be able to interact with the interface. This includes ensuring that all functionality is accessible via a keyboard and that time limits are flexible.
  • Understandable: The information and the user interface must be easy to understand. This involves using clear, simple language and providing guidance when users make mistakes.
  • Robust: Content must be accessible by a wide range of assistive technologies, ensuring that it can be interpreted reliably by different devices.

WCAG is divided into three conformance levels:

  • Level A: The minimum level of accessibility that must be achieved to address the most basic accessibility issues.
  • Level AA: The mid-range level that addresses more significant accessibility barriers, often required by legal mandates.
  • Level AAA: The highest level of accessibility, providing the most inclusive experience. Achieving this level is often ideal but not always required.

Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act (USA)

In the United States, Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires federal agencies to make their electronic and information technology accessible to people with disabilities. Although it primarily applies to government websites and digital tools, the private sector often follows Section 508 to ensure compliance with accessibility laws.

The Accessible Canada Act

In Canada, the Accessible Canada Act requires organizations in federal jurisdiction to create accessible environments, including digital spaces. This legislation aligns closely with WCAG and Section 508 but is tailored to Canadian law and regulation.

European Union’s Web Accessibility Directive

In the European Union, the Web Accessibility Directive mandates that public sector websites and mobile applications be accessible. The directive follows WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the standard and requires public institutions to provide an accessibility statement and an option for users to report accessibility issues.

EN 301 549 (Europe)

EN 301 549 is a European accessibility standard that applies to ICT (information and communications technology) products and services, including websites, software, mobile apps, and hardware. It is based on WCAG but extends beyond web content to cover software applications, electronic devices, and other forms of digital interaction.

Key Metrics for Measuring Accessibility

Measuring accessibility is crucial in determining how well a product meets accessibility standards and where improvements can be made. Here are some key metrics that organizations can use to measure accessibility:

Compliance Rate

The compliance rate measures how closely a website or application adheres to accessibility standards like WCAG or Section 508. This is usually expressed as a percentage of issues fixed relative to the total number of accessibility violations identified during testing.

User Satisfaction

User satisfaction surveys and interviews with individuals with disabilities can provide valuable feedback about how accessible and user-friendly a product is. These surveys can highlight pain points, usability issues, and the overall experience of interacting with the product.

Error Rate in Assistive Technology

This metric tracks the number of issues encountered when users interact with a website or app using assistive technologies, such as screen readers or voice input. A high error rate indicates that the product may not be fully compatible with these technologies, signaling the need for improvements.

Accessibility Testing Coverage

Testing coverage refers to how much of the product has been tested for accessibility. This can be measured by tracking which pages, features, and user flows have been tested and comparing that to the overall product.

Challenges in Accessibility Testing

Despite its importance, accessibility testing comes with unique challenges. Here are some common obstacles that teams encounter:

Lack of Awareness and Training

Many development and testing teams lack awareness of accessibility issues and the technical knowledge needed to implement accessibility features. As a result, accessibility is often an afterthought in the development process. To overcome this, organizations must invest in accessibility training and incorporate accessibility into the development life cycle from the start.

Rapidly Changing Technology

Assistive technologies evolve quickly and staying up to date with the latest innovations can be challenging. Developers must ensure that their products are compatible with the newest versions of screen readers, voice assistants and other assistive tools.

Time and Resource Constraints

Accessibility testing can be time-consuming, especially when it involves testing with real users who have disabilities. Manual testing, in particular, requires significant time and effort, which may be challenging for organizations with limited resources. However, investing in accessibility testing early on can save time and money in the long run by avoiding legal penalties and redesign costs.

Balancing Design and Accessibility

Designers often face the challenge of balancing aesthetic appeal with accessibility requirements. For example, color schemes that are visually striking may not meet contrast guidelines for users with visual impairments. Developers and designers need to work together to create products that are both visually appealing and accessible.

Best Practices for Accessibility Testing

To ensure that software is truly inclusive and accessible, it’s essential to follow best practices throughout the development and testing processes.

Start Early

Accessibility should be considered from the beginning of the design and development process. Waiting until the product is near completion to think about accessibility will likely result in costly and time-consuming redesigns.

Use Semantic HTML

Semantic HTML tags (e.g., <header>, <article>, <nav>) provide meaning and structure to web content, making it easier for screen readers to interpret. Using semantic HTML ensures that assistive technologies can navigate the content effectively.

Provide Alternative Text

Images should always have descriptive alternative text (alt text) so that screen readers can describe the content to visually impaired users. This is especially important for images that convey information rather than purely decorative elements.

Ensure Keyboard Accessibility

All functionality on a website or app should be accessible using a keyboard alone. Users should be able to navigate through menus, forms, and interactive elements using only the keyboard’s tab, arrow and enter keys.

Test with Assistive Technologies

Ensure that your software works well with assistive technologies like screen readers, voice control software, and alternative input devices. Regular testing with these tools helps identify compatibility issues early on.

Keep Content Simple and Clear

For users with cognitive impairments, content should be written in clear, simple language. Avoid using jargon or unnecessarily complex instructions. Short sentences and bullet points can make information easier to understand.

Provide Text Alternatives for Multimedia

Videos and audio content should include captions, transcripts, and sign language interpretation where applicable. This ensures that users with hearing impairments can access the content.

Regularly Update And Maintain Accessibility Features

Accessibility is an ongoing process, not a one-time effort. Regularly updating and maintaining accessibility features ensures that the product continues to meet accessibility standards as technologies and user needs evolve.

Conclusion

Accessibility testing is a critical aspect of software development, aiming to make digital products usable by everyone, regardless of their abilities. By prioritizing accessibility, organizations can promote inclusivity, comply with legal requirements, expand their audience, and enhance the user experience for all users. 

While accessibility testing can be challenging, following best practices and using a combination of manual and automated testing methods can help ensure that products are accessible to people with disabilities. In a world where technology plays a central role in daily life, ensuring digital inclusivity is not just a legal obligation but a moral one.

You're 15 Minutes Away From Automated Test Maintenance and Fewer Bugs in Production
Simply fill out your information and create your first test suite in seconds, with AI to help you do it easily and quickly.
Achieve More Than 90% Test Automation
Step by Step Walkthroughs and Help
14 Day Free Trial, Cancel Anytime
“We spent so much time on maintenance when using Selenium, and we spend nearly zero time with maintenance using testRigor.”
Keith Powe VP Of Engineering - IDT
Related Articles

Requirement Traceability Matrix RTM: Is it Still Relevant?

The Requirement Traceability Matrix or RTM has traditionally done the heavy lifting in software development and QA as a ...

How to Write Effective Test Scripts for Automation?

Test automation can be helpful for achieving QA goals. You can write test scripts that machines run on your behalf as often as ...

Test Manager Cheat Sheet

A test manager shoulders the responsibility of contributing to the QA operations in an organization. They work closely with ...
On our website, we utilize cookies to ensure that your browsing experience is tailored to your preferences and needs. By clicking "Accept," you agree to the use of all cookies. Learn more.
Cookie settings
Privacy Overview
This site utilizes cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Among these, essential cookies are stored on your browser as they are necessary for ...
Read more
Strictly Necessary CookiesAlways Enabled
Essential cookies are crucial for the proper functioning and security of the website.
Non-NecessaryEnabled
Cookies that are not essential for the website's functionality but are employed to gather additional data. You can choose to opt out by using this toggle switch. These cookies gather data for analytics and performance tracking purposes.