testRigor vs. Functionize
Are you searching for an intelligent automation tool that can reduce testing efforts, cut costs, and expedite test completion? Below, you’ll find a comprehensive comparison between testRigor and Functionize to aid in your decision-making. Explore and determine which tool aligns best with your needs.
Why testRigor?
Capabilities |
|
Functionize
|
Insights |
---|---|---|---|
Usability | |||
Generative AI-Based Test Creation | You have the ability to generate entire automated tests based on test case titles using testRigor's Generative AI engine. Just provide the title of the test case and watch generative AI create the test steps in seconds. | ||
Ease of Use |
Author test cases in plain English with testRigor, eliminating the need for coding or knowledge of automation. Use the same UI locators (text) in test cases as they appear on the screen. Functionize employs 'Architect', a Chrome extension, to record user actions and generate test steps based on these actions/clicks. 'Architect' needs to be installed separately. When using Functionize, users are required to click on the UI to produce each action and verification test step. Excessive clicks can result in a less satisfying user experience. Additionally, there's a learning curve involved; one cannot simply dive in and start creating test cases with 'Architect' immediately. While Functionize offers NLP-based test case creation, it's not as straightforward as testRigor's generative AI-based test case generation.
|
||
Supported Applications | |||
Desktop Web Testing |
testRigor supports desktop web, mobile web, desktop native app, and mobile app testing for Android and iOS, i.e., basically everything. Use either emulators or actual physical devices for testing, as your choice. Functionize supports only web testing on desktop and mobile through emulators.
|
||
Mobile Web Testing | |||
Desktop Native Application Testing | |||
Native and Hybrid Mobile App Testing - Android and iOS | |||
Supported Testing Types | |||
UI Testing | testRigor helps you build all end-to-end tests up to 15X faster. | ||
End-to-End Testing | |||
Data-driven Testing | |||
Cross-browser Testing | |||
API Testing | |||
Continuous Testing | |||
Database Testing | |||
Visual Testing | |||
Test Case Creation Features | |||
Supported Testing Types | |||
Behavior-Driven Test Generation | Both tools allow behavior-driven test generation via NLP support. | ||
Reusable Rules/ Subroutines |
testRigor and Functionize both support reusable rules. However, Functionize requires recording the test steps as Page Objects. Recording and then enabling the Page Objects requires many clicks/steps from the user. testRigor saves the reusable rules separately in plain English. Simply write the name of the rules in the test case to use it. This approach is more convenient and user-friendly.
|
||
Email Testing |
testRigor supports sending emails, receiving emails, sending attachments, and validating these three scenarios using plain English easily. Functionize supports email testing but requires many user clicks since it records the user's actions.
|
||
Multi-Factor Authentication(MFA) | Both tools support MFA via SMS and email. | ||
Captcha Resolution | testRigor helps automate image-to-text and Google Re-Captcha easily. Functionize doesn’t support captcha resolution. | ||
SMS Support |
testRigor supports sending SMS using Twilio. You can validate if the SMS is sent, delivered, or failed, and its contents. Functionize also provides SMS support.
|
||
Phone Call Support |
testRigor uses Twilio to provide phone call support. It can validate that a call is ringing, answered, etc. Functionize does not offer phone call support.
|
||
Geolocation Testing | testRigor works with geo locations and can emulate “moving” the device. Functionize does not provide any geolocation support. | ||
File Upload | Both testRigor and Functionize support file upload features. | ||
Audio Testing | testRigor enables audio testing by recording, comparing, playing, and validating audio files in tests with simple commands such as check that audio is playing . |
||
Downloaded File Testing |
testRigor verifies file downloads and validates their contents using simple commands such as Functionize requires training via “Architect” for actions and validation steps, which is not as convenient.
|
||
Video Testing |
With testRigor, for example, you can validate that the video is playing with the simple command check that video is playing. Functionize has no support for video testing.
|
||
Test Execution Features | |||
Run on Physical Devices |
testRigor supports emulator-based testing and on physical devices(via third-party providers). Functionize supports emulator based-testing only.
|
||
Parallel Test Runs | testRigor and Functionize support parallel test runs to achieve high-speed execution. | ||
Customized Test Data |
testRigor generates data based on detected field type (we support about 50 types), and you can provide your test data. testRigor generates random data conforming to a specific format every time the test runs. Functionize also includes support for customized test data.
|
||
Reporting Features | |||
Screenshots and Reports | Both testRigor and Functionize provide good reporting features. | ||
Recorded Video of Test Execution | testRigor provides recorded video of test execution by default. Functionize requires enabling this feature on demand to start recording. | ||
Maintenance | |||
Self-healing | Both testRigor and Functionize provide self-healing capabilities. | ||
Pricing | |||
Free Trial |
testRigor provides unlimited free public access, as well as a 14-day trial. Setting up a Functionize trial is a lengthy process, offering just a 14-day free trial period. After signing up, you must contact their Account Manager to have the trial provisioned.
|
Thank you for your request. Please select date and time for a demo.