 |
What IDT Wanted:
Less Maintenance
IDT QA Engineers were stuck with test maintenance and couldn’t progress after reaching 34% of test coverage.
Speed of Test Creation
IDT needed a tool to build automation quickly because manual testing was taking up too much time and resources.
Key Objectives:
- Save on cost
- Increase automated test coverage
- Less test maintenance
- Eliminate unexpected recurring bugs
- Work across a wide range of frameworks.
The IDT team was able to achieve 91% test coverage (from 34%) in 9 months time using manual QAs. They realized a 7X return on investment. And they saved $576.000 in the first year.
You can read the full case study here.
