Turn your manual testers into automation experts! Request a DemoStart testRigor Free

IDT’s Customer Success Story

What IDT Wanted:

Less Maintenance

IDT QA Engineers were stuck with test maintenance and couldn’t progress after reaching 34% of test coverage.

Speed of Test Creation

IDT needed a tool to build automation quickly because manual testing was taking up too much time and resources.

Key Objectives:
  • Save on cost
  • Increase automated test coverage
  • Less test maintenance
  • Eliminate unexpected recurring bugs
  • Work across a wide range of frameworks.

The IDT team was able to achieve 91% test coverage (from 34%) in 9 months time using manual QAs. They realized a 7X return on investment. And they saved $576.000 in the first year.

You can read the full case study here.

Related Articles

Upgrade.com Case Study

Rajan Arora from a fintech company upgrade.com is sharing how they switched to testRigor back in 2018 and the benefits ...

DataHerald Case Study

DataHerald’s Co-Founder and CTO Amir Zorhrenejad is sharing how their company was able to free engineering resources by ...

IDT Case Study

  IDT, A leading Telecommunications company went from 34% automation to 91% automation in under 9 months, all done by manual ...